πŸ“– Why Authentication Without Limits Is Dangerous?

πŸ“– Why Authentication Without Limits Is Dangerous?


πŸ—οΈ Introduction

Many systems implement authentication correctly and stop there.

This creates a false sense of security.

πŸ“Œ Correct authentication without limits is still dangerous.


πŸ”Ή Unlimited Retries Favor the Attacker

If your API allows unlimited login attempts:

πŸ”Ή Attackers can try forever
πŸ”Ή Automation removes effort
πŸ”Ή Time favors the attacker

Security becomes a probability game:

β€œEventually, something will work.”


πŸ”Ή Failure Still Costs Resources

Every failed login attempt still:

πŸ”Ή Hashes a password
πŸ”Ή Allocates memory
πŸ”Ή Uses CPU
πŸ”Ή Writes logs

πŸ“Œ Even failed attempts damage system stability at scale.


πŸ”Ή Small Leaks Become Big Breaches

Without limits:

πŸ”Ή One leaked password is enough
πŸ”Ή One weak account can be compromised
πŸ”Ή Abuse spreads quietly

πŸ“Œ Unlimited retries turn small mistakes into major incidents.


πŸ”Ή Authentication Alone Does Not Control Behavior

Authentication answers:

β€œWho are you?”

It does not answer:

β€œHow often should you try?”

πŸ“Œ Behavior must be controlled separately.


🧬 Characteristics

🧬 Unlimited retries favor automation
🧬 Authentication alone does not stop abuse
🧬 Scale amplifies small weaknesses
🧬 Limits are mandatory, not optional


🏁 Conclusion

Authentication without limits:

❌ Assumes good behavior
❌ Ignores automation
❌ Fails under real-world conditions

πŸ“Œ Secure systems control behavior, not just credentials.


Complete and Continue  
Discussion

2 comments